Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 10: Workflow does not contain permissions#49
Merged
Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 10: Workflow does not contain permissions#49
Conversation
…in permissions Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA permissions block was added to the CI GitHub Actions workflow, granting Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Poem
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Potential fix for https://github.com/sysfox/koishi-plugin-imx/security/code-scanning/10
In general, fix this by explicitly declaring a minimal
permissionsblock for the workflow or per job, rather than relying on inherited defaults. For a pure CI pipeline that only reads code and pushes coverage to an external service,contents: readis typically sufficient. No step in this file needs to write to the repository or manage issues/PRs.The best minimally invasive fix here is to add a top-level
permissionsblock just under the workflow name, applying to all jobs, and restrict it tocontents: read. This matches the CodeQL suggestion and keeps current functionality unchanged:actions/checkoutworks withcontents: read, and all other steps run locally or call external services. No existing steps, jobs, or actions need to be modified.Concretely, in
.github/workflows/ci.yml, insert:after
name: CIand before theon:trigger block. No new imports or additional definitions are needed.Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.
Summary by CodeRabbit